<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thesis: New SEO Options in Version 1.7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techforluddites.com/2010/04/thesis-new-seo-options-in-version-17.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techforluddites.com/2010/04/thesis-new-seo-options-in-version-17.html</link>
	<description>Increase proficiency. Decrease profanity.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:39:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.techforluddites.com/2010/04/thesis-new-seo-options-in-version-17.html/comment-page-1#comment-4399</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 23:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techforluddites.com/?p=2698#comment-4399</guid>
		<description>I was reviewing the &quot;tag page options&quot; in 1.7, I notice the &quot;Add noindex to this page&quot; &amp; &quot;Add nofollow to this page&quot; are both checked.  Is this correct?  Am I not limiting search engines from finding my pages?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reviewing the "tag page options" in 1.7, I notice the "Add noindex to this page" &amp; "Add nofollow to this page" are both checked.  Is this correct?  Am I not limiting search engines from finding my pages?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.techforluddites.com/2010/04/thesis-new-seo-options-in-version-17.html/comment-page-1#comment-3334</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 18:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techforluddites.com/?p=2698#comment-3334</guid>
		<description>Hey, thanks for a great article.  I searched just after 1.7 was released and couldn&#039;t find an answer, figured it might be too early, and then went back to my question again this morning.  In 1.6 there was a option to &quot;noindex&quot; category and archive pages and everyone recommended doing this to avoid duplicate content being presented to search engines.  I see that in 1.7 the &#039;blanket&#039; noindex has been removed and now each category and tag page is handled individually in the page options section.  I still have all of mine set to noindex as before.  What I am asking is if I remove the no index from a category and provide title and meta description tags is it no longer duplicate content?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks for a great article.  I searched just after 1.7 was released and couldn't find an answer, figured it might be too early, and then went back to my question again this morning.  In 1.6 there was a option to "noindex" category and archive pages and everyone recommended doing this to avoid duplicate content being presented to search engines.  I see that in 1.7 the 'blanket' noindex has been removed and now each category and tag page is handled individually in the page options section.  I still have all of mine set to noindex as before.  What I am asking is if I remove the no index from a category and provide title and meta description tags is it no longer duplicate content?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reorganized Options Panels and New Options Manager in Thesis 1.7</title>
		<link>http://www.techforluddites.com/2010/04/thesis-new-seo-options-in-version-17.html/comment-page-1#comment-3154</link>
		<dc:creator>Reorganized Options Panels and New Options Manager in Thesis 1.7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techforluddites.com/?p=2698#comment-3154</guid>
		<description>[...] more sensibly-arranged.&quot;  I&#039;m not sure what Chris means by &quot;leaner&quot; and in my previous post on the new SEO options, I explained how slow the Page Options page becomes if you have a large number of tags. So that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more sensibly-arranged.&quot;  I&#39;m not sure what Chris means by &quot;leaner&quot; and in my previous post on the new SEO options, I explained how slow the Page Options page becomes if you have a large number of tags. So that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

